Richard Benbow, listed as 24, which would suggest birth year of 1690, of Ratt. (
Ratcliff), Bricklayer, son of
Richard Benbow and Grace Beer, married
Elizabeth Cowtley (bap. 4 Oct 1696 at Saint Dunstan, Stepney), daughter of
John Cowtley and Mary Pateman, on
18 Sep 1714 at
St Dunstan's, Stepney. Elizabeth was said to be 21, but she was then a minor, at only 18.
Less than six months later, on 4 Mar 1715, under Burials in the Parish of Stepney, we find the burial of Richard Benbow, Ratc[liffe], Bricklayer.
Richard and Elizabeth's only child:
I cannot [yet] say what happened to Elizabeth Benbow (née Cowtley) or whether perhaps she remarried. There are surprisingly too many records of Elizabeth Benbow to isolate the relevant ones without more clues.
A transcript of a London Apprenticeship Abstract lists that Richard - who would then have been the correct age of 15 - son of Richard Bendbow (sic), Stepney, Middlesex, bricklayer was apprenticed to William Mart, Grocers' Company (
Worshipful Company of Grocers). Why he was apprenticed to a grocer when he clearly came back to bricklaying, we'll never know.
Richard's brother, James, also listed as son of Richard and a Bricklayer, later left three houses to Richard's daughter, Elizabeth Travally, his niece.
It has been claimed that Richard Benbow's father was John Benbow even attributing a baptism on 7 Nov 1693, at
St Paul's, Deptford - which was the baptism of the son of then Captain
John Benbow. One very good reason not to accept the 1693 baptism is because that child (already the 2nd child the Admiral had named Richard), was buried in Jan 1694.
A third Richard was born to Captain John and Martha Benbow in 1696. Still not unreasonable at the same age as Elizabeth Cowtley.
If that had been relevant, it would have made
the infamous Admiral my 8x Great-Grandfather. But, of course, it's not true. Whoever originally attributed that baptism for 'our' Richard was - as is so often the case - grabbing the nearest available record, just because.
Having had misgivings that a bricklayer could be a son of an Admiral the crucial proofs are Richard's apprenticeship, which names his father as Richard and the fact that 'our' Richard's father was a
Quaker. None of the baptisms would be the right ones, is because
Quakers don't practice baptism.
All that notwithstanding, clearly the Admiral was very keen to have a son named Richard, so we might assume this was a family name. The famous John Benbow was born in 1653; Richard Benbow Sr, Bricklayer, was born around 1659. At the very least they were contemporaries; they lived within the same parish; Benbow is hardly very common; there could still be a familial link.